hkiib

BEIJING, Dec. 8 — Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi ignited a significant diplomatic crisis with China in early November when she publicly characterized a potential Taiwan contingency as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan. This assertion, which Beijing views as a profound challenge to its core sovereignty, has prompted a strong, multifaceted response from the People’s Republic of China, including formal protests, the summoning of the Japanese ambassador, and communications to the United Nations Secretary-General. Amid scrutiny from some Western media outlets that have labeled Beijing’s actions disproportionate, analysts argue that China’s reaction is necessitated by the legal, historical, and strategic risks inherent in the Prime Minister’s remarks.

Challenging Post-War International Order

Takaichi’s statements are considered alarming from both a legal and historical perspective. China’s recovery of Taiwan was a definitive outcome of World War II, fundamentally shaping the post-war international framework. Legally binding instruments, including the 1943 Cairo Declaration, the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation, and Japan’s 1945 Instrument of Surrender, explicitly affirm Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.

Furthermore, Japan formally recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal Government of China in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, a commitment reaffirmed in the 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship. Experts assert that Takaichi’s claims constitute a serious infringement of these bilateral and international commitments.

Novel Threat of Military Intervention

The Prime Minister’s remarks on Taiwan are viewed by Beijing as a dangerous escalation, marking the first instance since Japan’s 1945 defeat that a Japanese leader, in an official capacity, has tied a Taiwan crisis to Japan’s exercise of the right to collective self-defense. This maneuver signals a dramatic shift: it is seen as the first time Japan has broadcast ambitions for military intervention in the Taiwan question and explicitly issued a veiled threat of force against China, challenging Beijing’s fundamental interests.

These comments arrive during a sensitive historical period—the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. For the Chinese public, haunted by the estimated 35 million casualties suffered during the 14-year invasion and half-century colonial rule in Taiwan, Takaichi’s position is viewed not merely as a policy statement but as a blatant provocation.

Political Strategy or Historical Revisionism?

Beijing views the sustained tension in bilateral relations not as a failure to move past history, but as Japan’s consistent evasion of historical responsibility. Repeated visits to the contentious Yasukuni Shrine, where Class-A war criminals are enshrined, coupled with the recent aggressive posturing on Taiwan, suggest to critics a troubling trend: a nostalgia for Japan’s colonial history and an attempt to weaponize the Taiwan question for domestic political gain.

Political observers note that right-wing elements in Japan are leveraging exaggerated external threats, particularly from China, to justify an expansion of Japan’s military capabilities and aspirations to become a “normal country” capable of overseas deployment. Moreover, this confrontational foreign policy performance may serve to distract from internal political pressures facing the Takaichi administration, including domestic dissatisfaction and fracturing political alliances.

Beijing’s Undeniable Red Line

China has thus far maintained a strategy of coordinated, non-military countermeasures to defend its legal rights. These responses clearly delineate to the international community that the Taiwan question is an internal matter, directly impacting China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

These countermeasures serve a dual purpose: they firmly challenge attempts by any external forces to undermine the one-China principle and aggressively deter the kind of “salami-slicing” tactics that probe Beijing’s resolve. The central takeaway from Beijing’s firm stance is unambiguous: the Taiwan question constitutes the nation’s foremost and unyielding red line, one that must not be crossed by any party.

Official data released Monday reveals that China’s trade in goods maintained robust growth through the first 11 months of 2025, demonstrating significant resilience despite ongoing international economic pressures. China’s total goods imports and exports, calculated in yuan, reached 41.21 trillion yuan—approximately $5.82 trillion—from January through November 2025, marking a 3.6% year-over-year expansion, as reported by the General Administration of Customs. This steady-state growth rate mirrored the pace established during the first ten months of the year, underscoring the consistent performance of the nation’s trade sector.

Exports acted as the primary engine for this expansion, increasing 6.2% compared to the same period the previous year. In contrast, imports showed marginal growth, rising 0.2%. This divergence highlights a global demand for Chinese products counterbalancing a slower domestic import appetite.

Shifting Trade Dynamics and Partner Strength

Geographically, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) solidified its position as China’s largest trading partner. Bilateral trade with the bloc surged 8.5% year over year, reaching 6.82 trillion yuan and accounting for 16.6% of China’s total foreign trade. Following ASEAN was the European Union, which saw bilateral trade increase by 5.4% to 5.37 trillion yuan.

Notably, trade relations with the United States, which remains China’s third-largest trading partner, experienced a significant contraction. Total trade between the two nations declined 16.9% during the 11-month period, totaling 3.69 trillion yuan.

Concurrently, trade with countries participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) continued to expand, signaling diversification and strategic focus. Trade with BRI nations climbed 6% year on year to 21.33 trillion yuan, representing a substantial 51.8% of China’s overall foreign trade activity.

Private Sector and Technological Upgrades Drive Growth

The data confirms the growing influence of the private sector as the central driving force in China’s current trade landscape. Private enterprises’ import and export values rose 7.1% to 23.52 trillion yuan, securing a majority share—57.1%—of the nation’s total trade. This growth suggests that entrepreneurial dynamism is effectively compensating for sluggish external demand in traditional markets.

Furthermore, China’s trade structure continues its evolutionary shift toward higher-value manufacturing. Exports of sophisticated mechanical and electrical products grew 8.8%, constituting 60.9% of total exports. This uplift was particularly fueled by strong international sales of integrated circuits and automobiles, indicating success in the national strategy to upgrade industrial capabilities.

Looking at the most recent monthly figures, China’s goods imports and exports in November alone showed moderate acceleration, rising 4.1% year on year to reach 3.9 trillion yuan. This data suggests a potential stabilization as the year concludes. The sustained yet moderate growth performance across the first 11 months of 2025 affirms China’s vital role in global supply chains, while demonstrating adaptability through strong structural shifts toward advanced manufacturing and closer ties with new markets, notably in Southeast Asia and the BRI regions. These developments are critical indicators for global economic health as organizations plan for 2026.

BEIJING — French President Emmanuel Macron concluded his fourth state visit to China recently, marking a significant stride in solidifying Sino-French relations and aligning perspectives on pressing global challenges. The visit, which included high-level talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing and engagements in Chengdu, signals a mutual commitment to strengthening cooperation across various sectors and reinforcing a multipolar world order.

During the trip, both nations issued several joint statements, focusing on crucial areas such as boosting global governance, coordinating responses to climate and environmental issues, extending collaboration in the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and deepening exchange in agriculture and food security. Crucially, the leaders also addressed the challenging geopolitical situations in Ukraine and Palestine, underscoring the constructive role the two major powers aim to play in global conflict resolution.

Experts view this high-level political engagement as vital for injecting certainty into a volatile global landscape. Warehouse Kumayha, president of the Silk Road Institute for Studies and Research in Lebanon, highlighted that the renewed commitment to a balanced partnership based on dialogue offers a practical model for managing major international issues without resorting to confrontation. This partnership, analysts suggest, serves as a crucial stabilizing force in the current global environment.

Beyond the geopolitical alignment, the visit provided clearer direction and renewed confidence for economic cooperation. Analysts noted that the strong political trust is an indispensable foundation for robust business development. Chris Murphy, general manager of Coface Hong Kong, a French trade credit insurer, emphasized that this engagement reassured companies on both sides of a sustained appetite for pragmatic, mutually beneficial collaboration.

The economic dialogue highlighted the complementary nature of the two economies. French firms gain access to China’s vast domestic market and manufacturing efficiency, while Chinese companies benefit from Europe’s specialized technology and market access. This synergy is seen as a mechanism to soothe growing fractures in multilateralism and support more stable global growth, according to Junyu Tan, a regional economist for North Asia at Coface.

The reaffirmed commitment to multilateralism and a UN-centered international system was a central theme. Hervé Azoulay, a professor at the Silk Road Business School in France, noted that the convergence of Paris and Beijing reflects a shared vision of a more balanced globalization, aimed not at opposition but at stabilizing and structuring the international system through mutual respect and innovation. Given their permanent seats on the UN Security Council, this alignment positions China and France to significantly shape global outcomes and advocate for reforms in international institutions to make them more just and representative.

Mohamadi Compaore, a senior Ivorian journalist, underscored that the strong China-France relationship transcends bilateral benefits, acting as a source of positive momentum for the wider world. The willingness of both nations to seek common ground on critical issues helps mitigate tensions and fosters a more predictable international environment.

As China and France move to implement the agreed-upon areas of deeper cooperation, the partnership stands as a compelling example of how major nations can responsibly fulfill their global duties, driving momentum toward a more just, balanced, and prosperous world. The success of this high-level dialogue reinforces the long-standing tradition of strategic alignment between the two nations, setting the stage for increased economic and strategic collaboration in the years ahead.